On Easter Sunday, Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, suggested that perhaps the people who think the Biblical Gospels are a sort of cover up of the truth have not really read them very well. "What if this is a story we haven’t really listened to before?" he asked in his article for the Mail on Sunday newspaper. "Whatever this [Biblical Gospel] is, it is not about cover-ups, not about the secret agenda of power; it may be nonsense to you, it may be unreal to
you, but don’t be deceived about the nature of the message and those
who lived it out in the days when the New Testament was being written," he said in his sermon on Easter Sunday. While his liberal Anglican views differ from Catholic Church teaching on important issues, what he had to say about the Gospel of Judas and Da Vinci Code is worth considering.
The events told in Luke's Gospel of two men's encounter with Jesus on the Emmaeus Road comprise one of those Gospel accounts of the resurrection that support the proposition that those who think this was a "cover up" have not read it carefully enough. First century men, trying to fabricate a story, would not have written this about themselves, most certainly not in contrast with what they wrote about the women from their own section of first century society. It even has its amusing moments. Those who think the Bible oppressive toward women, in particular, should take another look at this story. That is just not the way the men wrote it -- and it was the men who wrote it, after all. If they were trying to write something to justify themselves, to cover up the truth, and to oppress the women of their day, they would not have written about the Emmaeus Road.
The Gospel reading for this Sunday, April 30, follows the account of the appearance of Jesus on the Emmaeus Road, as told in Luke's Gospel. The portion included in the daily reading is Luke 24:35-48, which begins with two disciples' return to Jerusalem after that appearance, and tells of Jesus's appearance in the room with them after they described it.
The account of his appearance on the Emmaeus Road appears at Luke 24:13-35, and reads as follows in the Revised Standard Version:
13 That very day two of them were going to a village named Emmaeus, about seven miles from Jerusalem, 14 and talking with each other about all these things that had happened. 15 While they were talking and discussing together, Jesus himself drew near and went with them. 16 But their eyes were kept from recognizing him. 17 And
he said to them, "What is this conversation which you are holding with
each other as you walk?" And they stood still, looking sad. 18 Then
one of them, named Cle'opas, answered him, "Are you the only visitor to
Jerusalem who does not know the things that have happened there in
these days?" 19 And he said to them, "What things?" And
they said to him, "Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet
mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, 20 and how our chief priests and rulers delivered him up to be condemned to death, and crucified him. 21 But we had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel. Yes, and besides all this, it is now the third day since this happened. 22 Moreover, some women of our company amazed us. They were at the tomb early in the morning 23 and did not find his body; and they came back saying that they had even seen a vision of angels, who said that he was alive. 24 Some of those who were with us went to the tomb, and found it just as the women had said; but him they did not see." 25 And he said to them, "O foolish men, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! 26 Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?" 27 And beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself. 28 So they drew near to the village to which they were going. He appeared to be going further, 29 but
they constrained him, saying, "Stay with us, for it is toward evening
and the day is now far spent." So he went in to stay with them. 30 When he was at table with them, he took the bread and blessed, and broke it, and gave it to them. 31 And their eyes were opened and they recognized him; and he vanished out of their sight. 32 They
said to each other, "Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked
to us on the road, while he opened to us the scriptures?" 33 And
they rose that same hour and returned to Jerusalem; and they found the
eleven gathered together and those who were with them, 34 who said, "The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!" 35 Then they told what had happened on the road, and how he was known to them in the breaking of the bread.
Father Raniero Cantalamessa's commentary on this Sunday's Gospel mentions the surprising nature of this account and its aftermath, in comparison with what people might have expected the Gospel to say:
The disciples of Emmaus have just arrived out of breath to Jerusalem
and are recounting what happened to them on the road, when Jesus
appears in person in their midst saying: "Peace to you!" At first,
fear, as if they saw a spirit; then amazement, disbelief; finally, joy.
What is more, disbelief and joy at the same time: "And while they still
disbelieved for joy, and wondered."
. . .
All this tells us something important about the Resurrection. The
latter is not only a great miracle, an argument or a proof in favor of
the truth of Christ. More than that, it is a new world in which one
enters with faith accompanied by wonder and joy. Christ's resurrection
is the "new creation."
Similarly, Father Frank Doyle, SJ's Sunday Reflections on Living Space say "The disciples are filled with confused feelings. . . . They recognise him and do not recognise him at the same time."
It seems to have been beyond the imagination of the men on the Emmaeus Road that Jesus would have appeared to some of the women without having appeared to any of the men. They viewed the women’s reports as strange tales of visions of angels. However seriously the men may have taken the women’s reports, they did not see fit to remain in Jerusalem in case the Lord appeared again. When a stranger appeared among the men as they walked, they wanted to talk about the events of the day. They did not recognize the man who walked with them as Jesus. Were they in shock? They speak as if the town was in turmoil over the strange reports made by the women of their fellowship group.
The men wrote the Gospel accounts of these events, and even in the way they wrote them years after the fact, there is a story stranger than fiction. If the Gospel writers had not depended upon these accounts of the facts from eye witnesses, they would not likely have reported that the people closest to Jesus did not immediately recognize Him. Yet, that is the account given about both the men and the women. If the Gospel writers were trying to prove the resurrection, ego would tend to make them write that the leaders of the Church had visions and recognized the Lord. Yet that is not what anyone reported who was there at the time.
Even in ghost stories, people recognize the ghost. After a funeral, people comment that they still sense the presence of the person who has died, and they know whose spirit it is that they sense. They are not at a loss about the person’s identity. The ghost looks immediately like the departed.&nb